Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official: Camilla to be Princess of Wales
U.K. Times ^ | 4/3/05 | David Cracknell and Christopher Morgan

Posted on 04/02/2005 5:17:13 PM PST by anniegetyourgun

CAMILLA Parker Bowles will be given the title Princess of Wales when she marries Prince Charles on Friday, the government will announce tomorrow. The title will be confirmed in a parliamentary statement in response to a question from Andrew Mackinlay, a Labour MP. It is likely to anger supporters of the late Diana, Princess of Wales.

The disclosure, four days before the wedding, is potentially more embarrassing for Parker Bowles than the earlier admission that she will one day become queen. The title remains closely linked in the public mind to Diana, especially among those who blame Parker Bowles for ruining Diana’s marriage to Charles.

Parker Bowles has made it known that she wants to be called Duchess of Cornwall, taking another of Charles’s titles, after her marriage. It is planned that this will be changed to Princess Consort on his succession.

However, Chris Leslie, the constitutional affairs minister, will confirm tomorrow that she will be given all her husband’s titles. The list includes Prince of Wales, Duke of Cornwall, Duke of Rothesay, Earl of Carrick, Baron of Renfrew, Earl of Chester, Lord of the Isles and Great Steward of Scotland.

Senior government sources say that it would take an act of parliament to change the law for Parker Bowles not to accept the titles.

A spokesman for the constitutional affairs department said yesterday: “There will be a statement in response to a parliamentary written answer on Monday.

“It is simple: she automatically takes the title Princess of Wales and all the other titles that go with her marriage to the Prince of Wales.”

Vivienne Parry, who worked closely with Diana for several years, was alarmed at the disclosure. “How crass! You have to take account of the nation’s sensibilities. To the nation, Diana, Princess of Wales was irreplaceable,” she said.

“I actually feel sorry for Camilla: to saddle the poor woman with this title imposes a burden on her she has not asked for and should not have to bear. It is not fair on her.”

Mackinlay, whose inquiries led to the government’s statement that Camilla would become queen if Charles succeeded to the throne, believes that parliament is the custodian of the constitution and that it is not the place of senior royal household members to tell the country what they would like people to be called.

“There has been a disquieting lack of candour throughout this,” he said last night.

“The decision over titles is the property of parliament. It does not belong to Clarence House or even to Buckingham Palace. The custodians of the constitution are parliamentarians.”

It has also emerged that Charles and Parker Bowles will kneel down and say a prayer of dedication aloud together during the service which will follow the civil ceremony on Friday.

In a reference to their former spouses they will offer “our thoughts and words and deeds, our love for one another”.

According to recent opinion polls, Britain is slowly warming to the affair between Charles and Camilla, with 43% of people saying they approve of the marriage of the two divorcees — although another survey found that the figure was as high as 65%. Last summer only 32% approved.

However, the polls show that the public is less keen on Parker Bowles getting a meaningful title or becoming queen. A poll last month found that just 7% thought she should be queen.

Critics of the recent actions of Charles’s household say that trying to hide the reality of what will happen on Friday has not helped to prepare the British public to accept the marriage.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britain; britishroyals; camilla; charles; england; greatbritain; princecharles; princeofwales; princess; princessofwales; royals; scotland; theroyalfamily; theroyals; uk; unitedkingdom; wales
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: RichInOC

I've wondered that myself.


41 posted on 04/03/2005 8:36:13 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kalee
I believe his proper name is Charles Jefferson Clinton. So it's doubtful if he will apologize.
42 posted on 04/03/2005 8:40:18 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Probably because Charles doesn't want to do what his great-uncle had to do in order to get that title.


43 posted on 04/03/2005 8:41:32 PM PDT by RichInOC (Karol Jozef Wojtyla, May 18, 1920-April 2, 2005, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Charles will never be king and Camilla will never be queen. The next King of England will be William


44 posted on 04/03/2005 8:50:34 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: passionfruit
Wow makes me think that Charles and the Queen were using Diana for only a birthing vessel.

If factual what a tragic blow to the Boys knowing there mother was a hand maiden (I think thats the right term).

If Dianna's accounts of her time in the Royal Family from the beginning are true, what an awful feeling to be used and thought of as a animal to be bred and not really loved.

I don't care how much "royal treasures" she enjoyed without love it is nothing.
45 posted on 04/03/2005 9:04:16 PM PDT by oceanperch (LOOKIE LOOKIE WE UPDATED OUR PROFILE PAGE/LINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Camilla has Charles love something that was facade to Dianna.

I have to admit it makes me ill that he used Dianna.


46 posted on 04/03/2005 9:06:42 PM PDT by oceanperch (LOOKIE LOOKIE WE UPDATED OUR PROFILE PAGE/LINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun; Thinkin' Gal

That's crap.

BTW, way to mess up those boys heads (William and Harry). I don't believe they won't have problems from all of this.


47 posted on 04/03/2005 9:06:54 PM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (Boredom is simply a lack of attention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pubmom

Why not. If he doesn't want her, put her on the next boat over, so long as the dowry comes with.


48 posted on 04/03/2005 9:10:00 PM PDT by RightWhale (50 trillion sovereign cells working together in relative harmony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

what an outrage!

Kill the popular competition off then take her title.

Maybe the Windsors are too inbred. DOH!

Terminal idiots.


49 posted on 04/03/2005 9:10:54 PM PDT by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING ITS POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

The only Princess of Wales was Diana.


50 posted on 04/03/2005 9:14:13 PM PDT by Rainmist (Where are you Cosmo ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: starfish923; Thinkin' Gal
Mom should have let Charles marry Camilla 25 years ago, when he wanted to. Daina's parents, family and friends shouldn't have let her marry Charles. It seemed that everyone in the kingdom knew Charles loved Camilla except Diana.

I agree. Except you left one person unaccountable, CHARLES

All that he cared about was himself and becoming king. Either that or he wasn't man enough to do what he wanted to.

51 posted on 04/03/2005 9:14:36 PM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (Boredom is simply a lack of attention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Camilla and Charles and the Queen are equally guilty in this love triangle.


52 posted on 04/03/2005 9:16:40 PM PDT by oceanperch (LOOKIE LOOKIE WE UPDATED OUR PROFILE PAGE/LINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: myprecious
If she did not want this, she could have kept the previous title - Royal Tramp.

That title was already taken, or should we say - earned - by Diana.

53 posted on 04/03/2005 9:16:46 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: myprecious
Oh poor little Camilla. If she did not want this, she could have kept the previous title - Royal Tramp

How about Princess Tampax?

Btw, I hope the public throws oats at them after their ceremony.

54 posted on 04/03/2005 9:17:09 PM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (Boredom is simply a lack of attention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane; myprecious
That title was already taken, or should we say - earned - by Diana.

Nope. Charles had it first.

55 posted on 04/03/2005 9:18:48 PM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (Boredom is simply a lack of attention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Which was????? Facts only please.


56 posted on 04/03/2005 9:35:12 PM PDT by oceanperch (LOOKIE LOOKIE WE UPDATED OUR PROFILE PAGE/LINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Oh a Handsome King!


57 posted on 04/03/2005 9:36:21 PM PDT by oceanperch (LOOKIE LOOKIE WE UPDATED OUR PROFILE PAGE/LINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

I totally agree!

The tabloids already show Harry gone wild.

Are both boys of age yet, that would be one saving grace that Charles and Camilla will not be parenting them.


58 posted on 04/03/2005 9:42:40 PM PDT by oceanperch (LOOKIE LOOKIE WE UPDATED OUR PROFILE PAGE/LINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Quix

No shame.

On either adults part.


59 posted on 04/03/2005 9:52:49 PM PDT by oceanperch (LOOKIE LOOKIE WE UPDATED OUR PROFILE PAGE/LINKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch

I guess when they consider themselves their own gods, the whole concept of shame is missing from their synapses.


60 posted on 04/03/2005 10:31:00 PM PDT by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING ITS POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson