To: silverleaf
So what's your point? He ripped off his patients, was cited, fined and put on probation and he tried to do the same to the Schindlers?
Fl Statutes 451.331 1 n
"(n) Exercising influence on the patient or client in such a manner as to exploit the patient or client for financial gain of the licensee or of a third party, which shall include, but not be limited to, the promoting or selling of services, goods, appliances, or drugs."
How does this relate to court testimony by him in Terri's case where he could produce on proof of his claims?
His treatment pertains to "stroke patients". Were you aware Terri did not have stroke or at least was not diagnosed as having one?
To: Smartaleck
Ah, I see it was beyond your ability to scroll to the pages and paragraphs I cited to see what the court found out about the actual medical results of his treatment. Almost uniformly improved every patient he treated, including the one who sued him for a $1,000 overcharge.
Yes Dr Hammesfahr treats mostly brain injuries caused by stroke- he has treated at least one strangulation victim, Terri may have been his second. He was almost certain he could have helped Terri improve her quality of life.
His treatment was noninvasive and results could have been shown in months.
But the court "grew impatient" with the delays in killing her.
Sad sad sad.
BTW- Remind me never to appoint you my guardian.
631 posted on
04/03/2005 11:30:53 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson