Did I bring into the discussion *wasting* money and *starve to death*?
Even if you haven't, there are many others who supported killing Terri who indicated that the cost of caring for her was an unnecessary waste of money. The money aspect of this issue is not irrelevant.
My question specifically addresses another issue. That is, once you have defined a person in Terri's condition (prior to her murder) as not worthy of life, on what logical basis do you justify allowing others who are in comparable conditions, but who were born that way, to continue living? Maybe you don't realize that there are tens of thousands of them (one estimate I heard: 100 to 200 thousand).