The judge ruled on the findings of a court appointed medical team - Dr. Cranford was the husband's medical expert. Sorry - you are distoring what happened and Dr. Hammesfahr is not evil - he is a quack.
I'M distorting what happened? I have to keep correcting you at every turn. It was only 45 minutes, as I said. I wasn't referring to the tape, but the time actually spent assessing her. Brain operations may be delicate, but Michael was told by her doctor to have the implant removed. It wasn't supposed to stay in.
Come on, all this stuff is available in every thread for you to read, surely you've read it by now. Dozens of reputable neurologists were aghast that these tests were not performed yet a definitive diagnosis was still made.
Doctor Hammesfahr was accused of a whole litany of things by the medical review boards. Almost all the charges were found to be without merit, except for a billing mistake of which he was cleared on appeal. It might have been reasonable to believe him a quack while the charges against him were being investigated, but since he's been cleared of them what basis is there for your continued claim?
[note 1: Yes, I'm aware of the Nobel Prize Nominee nonsense. Doesn't help his credibility, to be sure, but I've on occasion over-trumpted what I thought were prestigious awards. So what?]
[note 2: The billing error occurred when a patient who prepaid for one treatment regimen showed up and asked for a different (cheaper) treatment regimen. He should have been either credited the difference or else told that his prepayment would be nonrefundable and he should use the more expensive regimen since it was already paid for. Clearly either Dr. Hammesfahr or his billing staff made a mistake, but of a likely-accidental nature.]