Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilipFreneau
"Certainly not NAFTA and GATT since they are unconstitutional treaties (the constitution requires supermajority approval by the Senate for treaty ratificaation)."

Ahh Philip, you miss the point NAFTA and GATT are not treaties, they are "agreements" you see if you call it an agreement you don't have to have a supermajority, which would have been nigh onto impossible to get. I did learn something from the Klintoons.

67 posted on 04/01/2005 9:24:42 PM PST by DaiHuy (Jesus is Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: DaiHuy

>> Ahh Philip, you miss the point NAFTA and GATT are not treaties, they are "agreements" you see if you call it an agreement you don't have to have a supermajority, which would have been nigh onto impossible to get.

Unbelievable! I thought I was the only one outside of government who understood that point. Maybe there is hope for our nation after all. God Bless!


68 posted on 04/01/2005 9:29:09 PM PST by PhilipFreneau (Congress is defined as the United States Senate and House of Representatives; now read 1st Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson