Do the implications of "cooperating" not sound any alarms?
I think this is great.
Watch your back, Sandy.
Ms. Kaiser Sose:"Fetch the files on every one of
our judges involved, from our 950 stolen FBI files,
I mean, 'badges-of-courage', Short-one."
I'm with you. Burglar is a coward and was facing some big, big charges. I will not get my hopes up, hoping to be pleasantly surprised with additional players...
"Do the implications of "cooperating" not sound any alarms?
I think this is great." - cyncooper
What cooperation? The non-punishment looks like Bush-league justice for a fellow member of the political class.
Usually when someone is cooperating, they are turning in someone else (such as others involved in the crime) or otherwise doing something to help with the damage they caused (e.g., spy describes in detail the info that he turned over to our enemy).
Is he simply describing in detail the documents that he illegally destroyed or could there be others involved in his crimes?
One more thing, why should he ever get a security clearance again? If he was a lower level person who had so outrageously and intentionally violated laws about handling secrets, he would never get a clearance again.