Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
>> the Schindlers' witnesses repeatedly perjuring themselves.

That's not viable. No perjury was even alleged, by anyone, so far as I know. Certainly nobody was charged with or convicted of perjury. Greer could have brought the charge himself but for one problem -- he didn't have any evidentiary reason to doubt the depositions. You can call them perjurers all you wish, but that's defamation unless you can prove it. I don't think you can.

19 posted on 04/01/2005 6:33:14 AM PST by T'wit (Liberalism reduces America from a Shining City on a Hill to a fetid slum in a fever swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: T'wit
That's not viable. No perjury was even alleged, by anyone, so far as I know.

Well, when someone says "A, definitely A" in their testimony, and then says "well, actually it was B" on cross-examination, with A and B being completely contradictory, that fits a reasonable man's definition of perjury.

28 posted on 04/01/2005 8:52:33 AM PST by Poohbah (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson