Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Lifesaving and life sustaining are not the same thing

Does that mean that you believe feeding tubes should be inserted, even if expressly against the written instructions of the patient?

71 posted on 03/31/2005 6:35:33 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: malakhi
Does that mean that you believe feeding tubes should be inserted, even if expressly against the written instructions of the patient?

That's a canard, IMO. Most folks anticipate a life ending event other than starvation, e.g. disease or trauma. Living Wills can cause trouble. A person says "no respirator," but what if 24 hours on a respirator is a life/death difference where the patient comes out whole? Do you still want "no respirator?"

72 posted on 03/31/2005 6:40:30 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: malakhi
Yes. Unless triage-type circumstances prevent it. That would include a patient that clearly would not survive three days even if fed. If the patient survives three days -- put the tube in.

Don't write a death contract on yourself in the hubris and comfort of a day when you are strong and healthy -- because on the day whan that changes your mindset and outlook about what you can and will live with is likely to change too.

74 posted on 03/31/2005 6:45:19 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson