[Crackingham]

The mere possibility that a question of federal law might arise is being sufficient to satisfy the "arising under" jurisdictional authorization of Article III [Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177 (1803), Chief Justice Marshall].

You are correct about that part. If that was all Congress had done there would've been no problem. What they did was go a step further and dictate how the actual legal proceeding would be conducted in court. That's a violation of the separation of powers.

[Diogenesis]

So YOU say. We disagree.

This Atrocity is Judicial Murder by Starvation and Dehydration

ALL JUDGES INVOLVED SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR CONSIPIRACY TO MURDER