Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
Fixed that for you

Sorry. the law does not give you the right to change it.

"744.3215 Rights of persons determined incapacitated.--(1) A person who has been determined to be incapacitated retains the right:" means something. In any case, a guardian could be anybody depending on the situation.

2,786 posted on 04/01/2005 11:52:12 AM PST by AndrewC (All these moments are tossed in lime, like trains in the rear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2785 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
Oh, yeah, why not a lawyer for a guardian? What does that next of kin know, anyway?

Regardless of whether or not the guardian can be literally anyone, your argument falls apart the instant we realize that the incapacitated person retains the right to counsel, but by virtue of their incapacity, the guardian is empowered to exercise that right on their behalf - that's what guardians are for, to exercise rights on behalf of others who are not capable of so doing for themselves. It most certainly does not mandate lawyers for incapacitated people, particularly lawyers imposed regardless of the patient's or guardian's wishes. "The concept still applies" - please. That penumbra will be emanating all over you before you know it.

2,787 posted on 04/01/2005 12:03:27 PM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2786 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson