Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
LOL. Well, then, I guess you'd better explain how your Probate Attorney's Full Employment Act will create an "interested person who may reasonably be expected to be directly affected by the surrogate or proxy's decision". And assuming we get through those rapids, we can then contemplate the practical day-to-day effects of the scheme you're proposing. Basically, every incapacitated person automatically gets a court-appointed attorney, which, of course, the state will have to fund. Then, even better, that court-appointed attorney, a complete stranger to the family, now has effective veto power over the legal guardian by virtue of the fact that they're empowered to tie the guardian up in court from now until the end of time. Well, hell - why didn't you just say so? That's just the sort of intrusion that people will welcome with open arms, I'm sure. LOL. I think you should write your congressman and your state rep with that plan, and see if they don't drop it like a hot rock.
2,758 posted on 04/01/2005 9:03:25 AM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2754 | View Replies ]


To: general_re

That's easy, the law states the right to counsel.


2,759 posted on 04/01/2005 9:11:40 AM PST by AndrewC (All these moments are tossed in lime, like trains in the rear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2758 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson