To: AndrewC
What else were they going to say? "We need more time, period" is also not an argument that buys you an injunction, and an injunction was what they needed. Congress granted a de novo review to a dead woman. Yippee. Yay for them.
2,679 posted on
03/31/2005 11:25:02 PM PST by
general_re
("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
To: general_re
What else were they going to say? "We need more time, period" is also not an argument that buys you an injunction, and an injunction was what they needed. Congress granted a de novo review to a dead woman. Yippee. Yay for them.It is obvious the Constitution requires due process. That is in toto. It does not require the sanctity of an injunction. The injunction must be granted in order to achieve the due process required, required by the Constitution.
2,680 posted on
03/31/2005 11:30:18 PM PST by
AndrewC
(All these moments are tossed in lime, like trains in the rear.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson