Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ohioan from Florida

Did he really sit on it, or is that pretty typical for that area? Genuine question here - no tricks, etc.


2,311 posted on 03/31/2005 5:33:21 PM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2308 | View Replies ]


To: general_re

He sat on it, over and over again. Last time it was brought up before him was Nov. 2003. He chided the Schindlers in May, 2004 for trying to file an emergency guardianship order with him. He said that that is to be used only when they have no legal recourse to advance, and he reminded them that they already filed for it (regular guardianship) in 2002. Michael was to be deposed twice (last August and then again in September) but he never showed. A court recorder was there, but no Michael. Greer never issues a contempt-of-court order, which definitely would have happened to you or I had we been in the same position. Then, adding insult to injury, Greer totally ignored ruling on a guardianship hearing in Feb/Mar when it was brought up again. He's been hiding from it, because it would show on appeal that he has been allowing Michael to get away with violating the guardianship rules over and over again.


2,345 posted on 03/31/2005 6:04:51 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2311 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson