Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hershey
He insisted what they'd done was unconstitutional.

Ultimately, what's constitutional doesn't depend on what judges say, or what Congress says, or any of that. Ultimately, the Constitution has as much or as little meaning as we, the people, allow it to have. Right now, there isn't much of a clamor to change things, so that'll have to change before the law can change, likely.

2,294 posted on 03/31/2005 5:23:40 PM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2247 | View Replies ]


To: general_re

Bush's list of conservative judicial nominees has the dems and the activist/liberal judiciary running scared, and we all know why, since it's how they've shoved through liberal decisions that have turned the country upside down. (There is a clamor to change things, such as that infamous Ninth Circuit Court.) This is why democrat ex-judge Catherine Crier (sp?) went ballistic last night on Hannity and Colmes. She can read the writing on the wall.


2,328 posted on 03/31/2005 5:43:27 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson