Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
I'm sorry, but it simply doesn't say that.

What does it say? I don't see anything that limits it to artificial food and hydration. The absense of any qualifier would seem to suggest 'all', especially since Greer refused a motion to allow natural feeding and hydration.

2,123 posted on 03/31/2005 3:07:43 PM PST by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2116 | View Replies ]


To: supercat

In order for the order to "directly prohibit" feeding by mouth, it should say something to that effect, don't you think?


2,130 posted on 03/31/2005 3:09:29 PM PST by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson