Well, you might be kidding around.
Anyway, I post what I honestly and truly believe, even when it conflicts with the rhetoric of bash, bash, bash against our leaders. I post that I disagree with our leaders, but I defend them from the bashing.
I have been in conflict with a large number of "Terri's Angels", whom I greatly admire for their devotion to this cause. As much as my heart and emotions are into this, I tend toward attempts at analysis, incisive commentary and factual discussion - that is, as I see them. Screaming headlines about the horrible Bush cowards, the attacks on Laura Bush...that's not me.
I don't agree with our leaders(including the wimpy Congress on the subpoena issue) on this at all, but I explain how they come to it, in their world of "must accept and obey court orders even when they're wrong".
(On that, I would like to engage them in a question session; for instance, what if this were Jenna or Barbara, or what about the Nazi orders to starve the Jews...they were "legal" too? Where is their break point: what would courts have to do in order to justify the Bushes refusing to follow their rulings?)
This does not fit in here. A few FReepers have told me it's okay, though. But the difference is STARK.
I don't kid much on here.. I have an awful memory.. only a few names stand out as enemies on here, and as I said yours wasn't one of them..
You have to be true to yourself and your beliefs..
goodnite...