To: flaglady47
Why doesn't the court order her to be hydrated immediately by IV? Her rights to due process are being violated by STARVATION. She can't have a hearing if she's alread dead from dehydration and starvation. I cannot being to understand why they have not ordered her to be hydrated and fed while this is litigated. This is beyond cruel. It is cruel and insane at the same time. What possible "legal" reason could they have not to save her life so she can have this hearing?
681 posted on
03/30/2005 12:19:24 AM PST by
carl in alaska
(Blog blog bloggin' on heaven's door.....Kerry's speeches are just one big snore.)
To: carl in alaska; narses; NYer
Which law school and college did this slimy Greer creep attend anyway?
To: carl in alaska
Why doesn't the court order her to be hydrated immediately by IV? Her rights to due process are being violated by STARVATION. She can't have a hearing if she's alread dead from dehydration and starvation. I cannot being to understand why they have not ordered her to be hydrated and fed while this is litigated. This is beyond cruel. It is cruel and insane at the same time. What possible "legal" reason could they have not to save her life so she can have this hearing?
HA! It' obvious. They only took the case in order to declare the law Congress passed to be unconstitutional, which Whittemore failed to do, and put the final nail in the coffin. Giving wishful thinking people a sliver of hope to dash away after another interminable wait and to once again flaunt their absolute power in your face are just little side benefits for the Judicial Oligarchy. (our true unofficial form of government)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson