Replies

Dear Dominick,

Yes, I agree, if they'd struck that law, the current legal arguments against the murderers would be stronger.

However, murderer greer's order is still illegal on the face. Your quotation of law includes:

"...including artificially provided sustenance and hydration,..."

Giving a cup of water to a disabled woman is hardly "artificial sustenance or hydration." She swallows her own saliva (or did when she was permitted by the murderers to have any). But the murderer greer forbids even offering her a cup of water.

Furthermore, I'm reasonably sure that this applies to end-of-life circumstances, not to the severely disabled.

Finally, as the murderer m. schiavo has violated the legal obligations of guardianship for some years, it is not legally legitimate to rely on the authority of a clearly-discredited and clearly-conflicted guardian (can you say "he's got a live-in and a couple of illegitimate kids to support?").

We have tyrannical rule by judges. They have twisted the written law where they could and disregarded the written law when they had to, in order to achieve their own purposes.

Political leaders who fail to see the overthrow of the constitutional order inherent in this situation will be unable to fix what needs fixing.

sitetest

However, murderer greer's order is still illegal on the face.

Wholly legal by definition. Wholly immoral by substance. An order like this could be refused, but unless one wished to be arrested, not abrogated. Why are you talking to me like I think this is licit?

Why wouldn't her parents just feed her in contravention of the order? They would be arrested. They would demonstrate the resistance to the order.

At this point, the case was turned on the law I quoted above. The Schindlers know it. I think that they can't stop the bad decisions they made to get Randall Terry, Jesse Jackson and other publicity hounds. These people don't want Terri to live, but to die to get themselves on TV crying crocodile tears. If this was my daughter I would be doing everything I could, and I may make the same mistake.

At this point, my assessment is that none of the actions I condemned earlier will allow Terri to be saved. IMHO, these protests at the hospice are pointless, unless you wanted to kill the prolife movement. The attacks on Gov Bush and Pres Bush are asinine, and will fail to save Terri, but will serve to elect Democrats. The MSM is follow the script and people who are otherwise good people are falling into this trap.

I spend time and energy promoting life and working to abolish abortion, and people who have no other interest but to be on TV are promoting themselves as prolife protesters and fraudulently portraying the role on TV. These actions of theirs are not to save Terri, but to destroy what many have worked to promote for years.