Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
Actually, it is not clear at all.

Actually is is clear. Congress has the authority to issue subpoenas and the executive has the authority to compel attendence. There is, so far as I know, no limit on whom Congress can subpeona because there is no authority to prevent their consideration of legislation of any kind they desire.

It is also painfully clear that neither Congress nor the Administration had the backbone to follow through because of political considerations.

Please quit blaming the courts for not reaching beyond the pleading filed by Gibbs.

Oh come on. Courts often go beyond the presented arguments for the reasoning of their decisions. I wouldn't call it routine, but it is certainly not uncommon. If ever there was a case calling for it, this was it. The courts had been directed to perform de novo review of this case WRT Terri's constitutional rights. This court showed no deference to the intent of the law whatsoever. We live in a judicial tyranny - the consent of the governed is dead.

45 posted on 03/29/2005 4:38:54 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: edsheppa
It is also painfully clear that neither Congress nor the Administration had the backbone to follow through because of political considerations.

What? You mean the possible deaths of federal agents & local law enforcement officers that would have occurred had the Marshalls and/or Nat'l Guard been called in to seize Terri? I wanted Terri saved but not at the price so many on FR seem to want to pay.
54 posted on 03/29/2005 5:02:10 PM PST by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson