Excuse me but this is only true in the criminal part of the trial. When the sentance is deliberated this doesn't hold true. They used the law introduced in the trial to find him guilty, then some of them used the bible to decide if it was ethical to sentence the person to the death penaltry.
What is the differenc in doing that and simply using an innate sense of right and wrong in deciding? None, except the bible is a much surer guide to morality than say a "progressives" sense of right and wrong.
Thank you for pointing out this oversight on my part, now I understand the outrage!