Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper

the quake was shallow and did not occur in deep water, which may mean less of a deadly tsunami risk.


199 posted on 03/28/2005 9:33:12 AM PST by kendu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: kendu
the quake was shallow and did not occur in deep water, which may mean less of a deadly tsunami risk.

Wrong. You've got that backwards.

205 posted on 03/28/2005 9:35:17 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: kendu
the quake was shallow and did not occur in deep water, which may mean less of a deadly tsunami risk.

Incorrect. Shallow quakes are more dangerous. If it's near the same location as the December 2004 quake, it's in deep water.

251 posted on 03/28/2005 9:43:54 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson