Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TruthSetsUFree

"Unfortunately, there were those in Congress who insisted on changing the wording of that law from "shall" grant a de novo hearing to "may" grant a de novo hearing. "

Nope...the wording said "shall" and it also said that the findings from previous court records could not be used. Look up the statute.


947 posted on 03/28/2005 11:59:31 AM PST by LegalEagle61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies ]


To: LegalEagle61

So, therefore GWB could have intervened last Tuesday to enforce a new federal law, one not yet declared unconstitutional by the popular judiciary.


950 posted on 03/28/2005 12:00:30 PM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 947 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson