Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: utahagen

Yes. Perhaps it's the new argument presented. Perhaps it's the one of two judges who ruled in favor before. We can only pray there is a hope here.


3,960 posted on 03/30/2005 9:25:36 AM PST by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3957 | View Replies ]


To: Types_with_Fist
I wish to God the judges would order the tubes reinserted while they evaluate the underlying issue! Anyone know if a separate filing for temporary reinsertion has been made? Or can the judges on their own ask the tubes be inserted while they evaluate the underlying issue?
3,965 posted on 03/30/2005 9:28:07 AM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3960 | View Replies ]

To: Types_with_Fist

If, ultimately, they insert the feeding tube, then rule against her...will this thing start again? Does anyone know?


3,967 posted on 03/30/2005 9:28:44 AM PST by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3960 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson