[LegalEagle61]

They need to hydrate immediately, so they will first rule on the injunction and she should get the hydration back as long as their arguement is plausible and shows new evidence, which I am thinking is the affadavits from the doctors and possibly even the fact that she spoke the 18th. But her 14th ammendment rights have still been violated so they may have added that. I am waiting anxiously to see the filings! I would think we may hear something tonight...and then they can schedule the de novo trial which would allow the Schindler's to bring in new evidence and get rid of MS as guardian of Terri.

[pollywog]

when you say " hydrate immediately" , you are saying as soon as they get to court, they will ask for the hydration to begin, even before the hearing is done?? Oh how I wish I had obeyed my daddy and went on to higher education. I would have been a lawyer.......sigh sigh!!!

[Deo volente]

Hugh Hewitt has been talking this for about a week now on his radio program.
And there's much analysis on his website about this egregious error.

Sen. Santorum was also talking about this last week.

What took so long for the attorneys to get this before the appeals court?

It was painfully obvious that Whittemore was advocating for Greer, in assuming that the Schindlers did not have a chance to prevail in a "de novo"
review. He was prejudging the evidence before it could even be entered into the record. He assumed that Greer's findings of the facts would prevail again in the new trial.

He's NOT ALLOWED to do this!