What do you think?
Now that all other appeals have been exhausted, I wonder why someone isn't pursuing this approach.
There seems to be enough evidence to file charges, in my opinion.
I agree. Executive power is vested in the executive. I do not believe that a judge can tell a chief executive not to use his power. For instance, at the federal level, only the legislature can remove it with his consent unless they can override his veto. As I said considering the power to pardon, where has anybody prevented a chief executive from using plenary power.
The polls and the press have cajoled Jeb and George Bush into submission. It's over.