[maine-iac7]

That was hearsay delivered by very questionable witnesses. Not even the USSC will defend that one in a hard nose confrontation

ahh, what part of the USSC refused to even hear the case did you miss?

[ARCADIA]

ahh, what part of the USSC refused to even hear the case did you miss?

Refusing to hear a case is not the same as making a ruling. The USSC is an appellate court. Determining facts is something that is done at a lower court. If you want them to review the case you need to raise a compelling constitutional issue.

Presenting new evidence is not enough, you have to show that something in the way the trial process was handled was so wrong so as to deny you due process granted under Federal Law, or by the US Constitution.