Either there isn't as much as you think, or the Schindler lawyers are presenting it ineffectively.
Why didn't at least Thomas & Scalia dissent when the U.S.S.C. refused to hear the case? Do you think it was due to political expediency? Are they friends of Greer?
As for the Federal Judges, most of them in that area are Clintoon appointees anyway.
Yes. The one Federal judge in Atlanta who thought the feeding tube should be reinserted was a Clinton appointee. One of the ones who upheld Greer was appointed by Bush I.
No because where Greer is on the bench is still a very heavily Democratic area of Florida.
The state appeals judges are not all from heavily Democratic areas.
Spin it how you want Amelia.
You're the one who appears to be continuing to assert that even Federal judges who don't have to stand for election are supporting this due to political expediency.
"Why didn't at least Thomas & Scalia dissent when the U.S.S.C. refused to hear the case? Do you think it was due to political expediency? Are they friends of Greer?
The ONLY reason that the SCOTUS did not agree to hear the case is because it only involved one person.
"You're the one who appears to be continuing to assert that even Federal judges who don't have to stand for election are supporting this due to political expediency."
And I haven't seen anything in this case to make me think otherwise.