[NoControllingLegalAuthority]

You argue legalisms. No system without a moral foundation can last long. A body of law built to allow this barbarism is wrong and should be completely dismantled by a moral society.

There were bodies of laws created during the Third Reich and the Soviet Union. They were airtight laws regarding the treatment of some people AND THEY WERE WRONG because they were immoral. You should note those systems are now dismantled because they were founded upon immoral principles that could not be sustained.

[Destro]

You argue legalisms. Correct and thank you for saying that.

I have been trying to get people to focus on the law and not the actions of the court which can not go beyond the law. In this sad case the law is what created this court decision.

The proper law would have had a review of her condition that would satisy everyone with little doubt as to if she was in a PVS or not.

PS: This issue falls into 2 camps - those that think her life support should remain because she is not in a PVS (the majority it seems) and those that are against her life support ending even if she is in a PVS - no matter what state she is in. Which one are you?