[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

You didn't look at that list. You just made an irrational attack called, "Ad Hominum".

This once again shows the lack of intelligence that you posess, due to your continued use of a irrational claim.

But of course, you wouldn't engage in ad hominem attacks.

For someone "posessing" intelligence so superior to mine, you ought to learn how to spell. Do that, then come back and insult me some more...m'kay? Moron.

[timburton]

>>>For someone "posessing" intelligence so superior to mine, you ought to learn how to spell. Do that, then come back and insult me some more...m'kay? Moron.<<<

YOu know you have lost the argument when you have to diss spelling. My spelling sucks, so what? At least I understand the laws of logic and apply them correctly. Which is more important, spelling or understanding how to think?

Questioning your intelligence isn't an ad hominem attack. It is a rational decision based upon reason.

-If you can't make a point without a logical fallacy, then you are unable to correctly use logic.
-If you are unable to correctly use logic, you lack in intelligence.

You qualify for that argument, because you make points using logical fallacy. After having pointed it out, you have not corrected your use of logic, therefore it is rational to state that you lack in intelligence.

Game, Set Match.