Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
If it is illegal (and I'll take your word for that at this point, for sake of discussion) to provide nourishment by mouth, then why have all the attempts to appeal this case been rejected?

Either because all of the judges are in collusion, or because no appeal based specifically on the order prohibiting any attempt at natural feeding has not been launched. I have not kept up with all of the court documents filed, but all of the news reports indicate that the appeals have focused on getting the feeding tube reinserted, not overruling the court order prohibiting natural feeding.
593 posted on 03/25/2005 9:55:58 PM PST by MTOrlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies ]


To: MTOrlando

Well, then the family's lawyers are incompetent.


604 posted on 03/25/2005 9:59:12 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Gnome sayin'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson