[Chad Fairbanks]

Well, he should just declare a state of mergency and activate the guard then.

Yeah, that's a good idea. Strip everyone of their rights, for the sake of one woman.

Can I have some of that crack you are smoking?

[MTOrlando]

Well, he should just declare a state of mergency and activate the guard then.

Yeah, that's a good idea. Strip everyone of their rights, for the sake of one woman.

Is that the best counterargument you can make? BTW, he does not need to declare a state of emergency to activate the guard, and he does not need to suspend civil rights either.

Do you think saving ONE WOMAN is not worth the trouble here? Please tell me exactly HOW MANY lives need to be on the line before you would support such action. Ten? One hundred? One thousand? And what is your moral and legal basis for making the distinction?