Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ex 98C MI Dude

Actually I think Shook's hearsay statement could have been admitted (at least in a federal court) as an admission by a party or opponent.


77 posted on 03/25/2005 1:41:30 PM PST by mandatum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: mandatum

Yes, but she was disbelieved by the Baron Lord High Executioner and Supreme Judge Greer. You see, it is really neat when you get to decide what evidence you want to admit into a civil trial. You get to direct the outcome. How cool is that! All you have to do is come up with a thinly veiled pretext for finding the person submitting the evidence 'not credible'.


82 posted on 03/25/2005 1:47:36 PM PST by ex 98C MI Dude (Our legal system is in a PVS. Time to remove it from the public feeding trough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson