Still, can you see Dr. Frist really confronting the issue of judicial tyranny after what George W. Greer managed to achieve in Pinellas Co.?
It's going to have to be challenged by someone. If Frist can't, he'll have to move over and let someone else take it on.
The problem will only get worse if it's not dealt with.
Theodore R. wrote: Still, can you see Dr. Frist really confronting the issue of judicial tyranny after what George W. Greer managed to achieve in Pinellas Co.?"""
I do NOT trust Frist! I do however, trust Delay. Read his exact words and you will understand. I doubt Delay knew the Lawyer for the Schindler's would have failed getting a de nova hearing from the Federal courts.
Delay is on our side and is one of few who are, in my humble opinion. All you have to do is this:
Look at those who are currently attacking Delay -->
THE MSM and the stinking ACLU types who are freedom of religion.
If Frist doesn't tell the dems that there will be no filibustering of Bush's nominees after all that has happened in this case, then he is hopeless....
This is a perfect example of one judge using his power to usurp the wishes of the people through their representatives, Governor, and POTUS---
I know that Reid and Leahy and Kennedy prolly already have a speech prepared warning Frist and the Reps not to use this case for policital "gain", but Frist needs to point out to them, that "the people" the put them ALL there, democrat and republican alike will vote them out, if something isn't done about activist judges....
I was really disappointed last night, when I heard that the reason that Sen. Kent Conrad (D) of North Dakota, and Sen. Tom Harkin (D) of Iowa prolly only voiced their pro-Terri stance on the Senate floor last week because they are both in trouble in their states in the upcoming election...
Don't know if that is true, but since I wouldn't trust Tom Harkin any further than I could throw him, I don't doubt it much...