Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeasideSparrow
Problem is - do you know that even groups producing non-partisan voter guides cannot get such information from judges running?

I found that out when I tried to get info in '00. I guess it is time to demand that judges answer election questions, too.

Another thing for local laws. When the same people go to court to re-hash an issue that has already been 'decided' and appealed, the first judge should be recused and a new Judge should hear the case. The same "biased," "corrupt," or "mentally impaired" judge should NOT be making all the rulings.

3,150 posted on 03/26/2005 9:27:29 AM PST by eccentric (a.k.a. baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3071 | View Replies ]


To: eccentric

"When the same people go to court to re-hash an issue that has already been 'decided' and appealed, the first judge should be recused and a new Judge should hear the case. The same "biased," "corrupt," or "mentally impaired" judge should NOT be making all the rulings."

Agreed.


3,179 posted on 03/26/2005 9:40:57 AM PST by SeasideSparrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson