[Dog Gone]

If the label is being used as a weapon, which it is, then it's relevant whether Greer, a judge assigned to the Probate Division, was a proper judge to hear this case.

Would you agree with that?

I don't see a "Guardian Division" in the Florida system. Unless my research was faulty, there isn't a category of judges called "Guardian judge." If you have information that corrects that, I'd happily receive it.

So unless I find further information that Greer wasn't a proper judge to hear this case, I have to conclude that the label put upon him is perhaps accurate in administrative terms only and that the implication that he is a judge acting out of jurisdiction or expertise is spin.

[Cboldt]

So unless I find further information that Greer wasn't a proper judge to hear this case, I have to conclude that the label put upon him is perhaps accurate in administrative terms only and that the implication that he is a judge acting out of jurisdiction or expertise is spin.

Ahh, I understand much better now. The issue was a label-fixation thing! Well, I'm pretty sure Greer's court was the proper venue for the case. I'm surprised anybody would raise or even spend time disucssing that issue at this point in the proceedings. I thought the discussion was more along the lines of how big and imporant he was, e.g. a fun (but totally irrelevant) "Big state judge" vs "Little county judge" sort of thing.