Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lord_Baltar
REally,we are back to that argument. So many judges did not get to review his extra marital situation,because Greer did not include it in the record.
The record was purposely made inadequate, and the appeals could not review as to the facts.
Once again,this is why Congress acted to ask for a de novo review,to end that very circular process.
Again please state your own legal qualifications.Mr Hewitt is indeed a talk show host on legal matters,but he has been practicing law for over 20 years and has been law professor for 10.
His arguments regarding estrangement are very cogent unlike yours I might add.
Repeating the same thing over and over does not make it anymore true. Although given your persuasion,it seems to me that you belong to the MSM crowd where the motto seems to be :If we say it often enough ,they'll believe it."
1,130 posted on 03/25/2005 12:41:11 AM PST by northernlightsII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1126 | View Replies ]


To: northernlightsII

NL, arguing with you is like wrestling Cotton Candy.

Let's talk once you can produce a Legal Decree of Divorce for MS & TS.

Til then, the argument is moot.

No ammount of 6 degrees of Estrangement, or Hewitt's latest Sermon on the Mount changes the facts as they stand.

You can argue until your blue in the face that MS & TS's marriage is invalid, but the Legal Facts do not back up your claims, as much as you would like them to.

So with that, I wish you a good night. I need to get to bed so I can get to work and make money to pay my Child Support, Alimony, and make payments on the rather large debt my ex ran up while we were separated...


1,133 posted on 03/25/2005 12:49:24 AM PST by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson