There are several ways to look at it. That would be one.many individuals who need emergency care would die. But it's a price worth paying to prove the sanctity of life.We killed them in order to save them?
Not trying to start an argument, but what other way is there to interpret it? It seems to say that it would be okay to cause many innocents to die to prove how sacred life is. That just strikes me as bizarre.
Or did I miss the sarcasm in your first post?