i know many legal scholars, among them Mark Levin, who are strong believers that judicial tyranny exists and runs rampant. do not paint those that disagree with you as ignorant.
Not in this case, and that's what I am commenting on.
Mark Levin? a JUDICIAL SCHOLAR?????
Let's take the recent reactions to two different cases by FReepers into consideration, shall we?
FReepers called it Judicial tyranny when a Court overturned the Texas sodomy law, and claimed that the law was duly enacted by the Texas legislature, and the Courts had no power to overturn them, and that only the legislature had the power to do so.
Now, FReepers are upset that Florida Courts are acting in accordance to the laws of the State of Florida as enacted by the legislature, and not in fact adjudicating in accordance to whether or not they agree with those laws.
Which way do we want to go here?
Should the Courts wait to perceive how the people "feel" about the laws, and to how they apply to particular cases before rendering decisions?