Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LegalEagle61

I am in the middle of it. It is very good.

It sounds like the two lower federal courts simply ignored the intent of Congress rather than the initial appeal being fatally flawed. (Whittemore is pure evil, IMHO.) Gibbs may have been too naive, but I don't think he was negligent, as someone asserted to me yesterday.


655 posted on 03/24/2005 4:15:10 AM PST by djreece (May God grant us wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]


To: djreece; LegalEagle61
It sounds like the two lower federal courts simply ignored the intent of Congress rather than the initial appeal being fatally flawed.

That is obvious by reading Whittmore's opinion, which refutes the contention. The pleadings must merely get the relevant facts in the case before the judge, which they did. Whittmore simply ignored the legal requirement for a de nova hearing assuming that he would find the same as the lower court did - prior to holding the hearing he was required to hold. IOW's under the federal statute, the findings of the lower court were mere hearsay, but Whittmore, just decided, well, if someone accused you of murder so, if I heard the case I would find you guilty, and therefore this silly little matter of a trial is just a waste of time. Sheriff hang the guilty sob.

688 posted on 03/24/2005 4:36:02 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson