I just heard one of the Schindler lawyers on Special Report and the main part of the case they made to the Judge was that they are challenging the hearsay testimony of Michael, his brother and sis-in-law as to Terri's alleged "wishes"...because they also have testimony that refutes it. Plus they are challenging the court's finding of PVS state of Terri and they had other stuff as well such as the abuse etc..., but he said the main focus was the hearsay testimony as that is the basis for this whole thing, so from what he said it sounds like they argued the right things..they included the disabled Persons Act too...hope and pray
That sounds promising, LegalEagle. Let's hope Gibbs cited excellent case law.
Nancy Grace on CNN headline Prime even seems to be pro- Terri finally.
What I'm finding everywhere is commentors' lack of theological knowledge stops them cold, and only brings them to a point. They want to help her, think the system can, and just take their hands off if law doesn't work.
One older lady hadn't seen the video of Terri, then when she saw it, although she saw it only while IN studio with Larry King, she changed her position on the spot and was pro-Terri.
If Terri could live, people would understand.