Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
Then what? Greer will issue an rule to show cause for contempt. There will be a contempt hearing. Greer will then order her tube pulled again.

Yes. However, if he GRABS her pursuant to Congress New Law, They can fight it out in court for years, in the interim, the Law can be followed, and a De Novo review can be had.

A dispute between branches of government is just that a Dispute.

Judge Greer, no matter what he thinks is Not the Law.

2,177 posted on 03/24/2005 12:41:20 PM PST by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "For your AMUSEMENT..." ; ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2169 | View Replies ]


To: hobbes1

no the new law was to open the door to the federal court.
The democrats refused to allow language in the new law which said "shall issue a temp injuction". They only agreed to the law as agreed. It got them into the opportunity into the door.

There would be no litigation for years. It would be expidited agains and then you would have greer and whitmore ordering the tube pulled. immediatly.

Judge Greer in his courtroom IS the law. Every judge acts that way and thinks that way and every judge protects the other judges. There is the think blue line and there is the thick black line.


2,249 posted on 03/24/2005 1:02:35 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson