[justshe]

Did you follow the reasons that atty gave for WHY the injunction was issued..and the ins and out of what DCF could and could not do? My hearing was that DCF could only view her at the hospice and could not remove her? Did I mis-hear? If so....apologies to all for my incorrect reporting!

[Theodore R.]

My hearing was that DCF could only view her at the hospice and could not remove her?

That's what I heard too. The DCF is a one-legged clothespin in this case, isn't it?

[Repub4bush]

You heard exactly what I heard. My mouth fell open. Others here have said that Atty is wrong, and I hope they are right. Mcgavin999 heard the same thing. :(

[supercat]

Did you follow the reasons that atty gave for WHY the injunction was issued..and the ins and out of what DCF could and could not do? My hearing was that DCF could only view her at the hospice and could not remove her? Did I mis-hear? If so....apologies to all for my incorrect reporting!

A few people from DCF should go there, one of them should deck Michael, and the rest should feed Terri since Greer's order only requires Michael to stop food and hydration for Terri--it imposes no requirements on anyone else.

[DJ MacWoW]

Did you follow the reasons that atty gave for WHY the injunction was issued..and the ins and out of what DCF could and could not do?

Greer would end up part of the investigation into exploitation etc. I can't imagine an injunction from him could stop DCF. Just as Schiavo couldn't stop it.