Well now the lawyer has finally got around to arguing to SCOTUS that killing Terri without her consent is a denial of due process, and per the new law, Terri has a right to have that one adjudicated, even though it is not in the complaint. As I keep saying, mal ...... . Almost certainly, too little, too late. The lawyer simply isn't generating the requisite paper, where and when required. SCOTUS is going to be loathe to slap down the lower courts for errors not of their own making. An American tragedy.
I wonder about Gibbs; I heard that in his pleadings in Atlanta that he said if the courts go against the Vatican that Terri would be damned to hell.
Have the attorneys raised the question about feeding Terri following removal of the tube? Removing the tube is one matter, but forbidding mouth-fed sustenance is quite another.
They are refusing minimal care and feeding as a means of carrying out a de facto death sentence that has not been adjudicated. This is horrible.
Greer should have sentenced Terri to death, and then carried out the sentence via hanging, firing squad, electric chair, or lethal injection. This would have been "up front".
I guess that explains how he - and his lady associate lawyer - have found so much time to be on TV and radio for interviews in the last several days.
That's the way I see it. I guess I'd like to hear Gibbs's side of the story before I accused him of legal malpractice, but I think his tactics doomed his case from the time it was filed in Tampa.