[Chad Fairbanks]

How much of that stuf fyou just posted is actually true? Do you actually have proof that this guy embezzled? Do you have proof that he drained those funds to pay for lawyers? How much of this is actually factual, rather than "I read it on a website somewhere"???

I'm not being facetious, I'm actually curious...

[anymouse]

Have you been watching TV or listening to the radio lately?

I tried to keep my statements as general as possible, but Micheal Shaivo's actions during this crisis and over the years don't sway me to give him the benefit of the doubt.

The Shindlers and numerous independent health care professionals, with first hand knowledge of Terry's true condition and Micheal's suspicious behavior, have bee very open with the media and come across as believable.

I'm no lawyer nor doctor, and unlike some Demo-rat Congresscritters, I don't pretend to play one on C-SPAN. But when it comes to the State ending a life, it is only humane to err on the side of life. If we can do so for the worst mass murderers, we can do so for a helpless woman, who cannot (or is not permitted to) let authorities know her true desire to live or die.

We need fewer amateur lawyers (and doctors) and more compassionate thinking human beings. Just because you can't prove something doesn't necessarily mean it isn't intuitively so. If it weren't so we could replace juries, judges and the legislature with computers.