Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
In other words, he has to cite many details of Greer's previous rulings while simultaneously arguing that Greer's rulings should be ignored in deciding the merits of his case.

No, he had to plead a cause of action that Greer had been party to violation of Terri's civil rights, which is just fine. Whittmore erred in citing the trial record as evidence to decide that the case could not succeed on the merits. But he had to set aside the trial record. In other words all Gibbs had to do was plead a civil rights violation. Instead of prejudging the case, Whittmore needed to try the case. The hearing was only about injunctive relief to keep Terri alive until the case is tried.

706 posted on 03/22/2005 8:42:24 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson

You said it way better than me.


712 posted on 03/22/2005 8:43:18 PM PST by atruelady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson