this is a joke, right? maybe a gas chamber would have been more efficient?
She shouldn't be put to death, but this is about as barbaric a way to do it as possible. It's absolutely heinous to kill someone this way.
this is a joke, right? maybe a gas chamber would have been more efficient?"
I agree with Tomahawk. Wouldn't it be more "humane" to give her a lethal injection instead of starving her? After all, if we starved the worst mass murderer on death row for as long as 2 weeks, every lawyer in the ACLU would be apoplectic.
"They should given her a lethal injection, once they decided that she must die because Michael wants her to."
I would rather be hung outside then starved to death.
It would be better than starving to death.
>>this is a joke, right? maybe a gas chamber would have been more efficient?
If she has no brain, no feeling, no conscience, and no soul, then what difference would it make? You can't have it both ways. Either starving her to death is cruel and unusual punishment or she has the same status as a potted plant. Which is it for you?
.....I want to believe he meant well.