Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigeasy_70118
Actually, I was being sarcastic. Now, the law reads,

"After a determination of the merits of a suit brought under this Act, the District Court shall issue such declaratory and injunctive relief as may be necessary to protect the rights of Theresa Marie Schiavo under the Constitution and laws of the United States relating to the withholding or withdrawal of food, fluids, or medical treatment necessary to sustain her life.

It seems to me that Congress is giving the Court the leeway to determine the merits of the suit. And I suspect that it couldn't be otherwise. Congress cannot simply order a Court to issue a particular ruling.

756 posted on 03/22/2005 9:43:30 AM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 732 | View Replies ]


To: ContraryMary

Putting the tube back in was the obvious "declaratory and injunctive relief. . .necessary to protect the rights of Theresa Marie Schiavo." It really doesn't take a Scalia or Bork to figure that one out.


774 posted on 03/22/2005 9:52:06 AM PST by nimbysrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies ]

To: ContraryMary
Congress cannot simply order a Court to issue a particular ruling.

And Congress didn't do that. They set a standard to be followed for issuing injunctive relief in this case. Now, if you want to argue that the standard fores the judge's hand, I won't disagree with you but obviously Whittemore didn't see it that way.

779 posted on 03/22/2005 9:53:40 AM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson