Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nimbysrule
The issue of the 14th Ammendment was addressed in Judge Whitmore's ruling, quite thoroughly, I might add.

I am not saying I like the way this came out, but I feel that Whitmore ruled the only way he could have ruled, based on the law, the only thing on which he could based his ruling.

730 posted on 03/22/2005 9:33:19 AM PST by Military family member (If pro is the opposite of con and con the opposite of pro, then the opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies ]


To: Military family member

In the 1950's, the federal and state processes and systems failed to protect the rights of blacks under the 14th Amendment. Two entities stepped in with drastic action. One was the USSCt, which produced the Brown v. Board of Education decision. Despite its praiseworthy result, most of the legal scholars I trust see this decision as the real beginning of the judicial coup. The second drastic action was of course the National Guard forcing the schoolhouse doors in Mississipi. I think we both want the same result here, but you have much more faith in the system and processes than I do right now. As such, I am willing to support more radical action by either the executive or (highly unlikely) the high Court in this case.


760 posted on 03/22/2005 9:46:09 AM PST by nimbysrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson