Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble
But would they continue to after hearing the facts of the case? Especially if Michael was forced to allow them to see Terri unsedated?
Yes, I think so.

You don't think jurors would find it odd that Michael never said anything about his wife's "wishes" until after he was engaged to another woman? And that his brother/sister-in-law never said anything about those wishes until Michael's testimony on the subject was challenged as self-serving and flimsy?

You don't think jurors would find it curious that Michael has spent so much of Terri's trust fund on efforts to have her killed, and so little on care or rehab?

Personally, I believe that if Terri's case were tried before a jury, it would be necessary to put up one of those glass walls that would normally protect a jury from the defendant, to protect Michael from the jurors who would otherwise rip him limb from limb.

1,628 posted on 03/22/2005 5:02:07 PM PST by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1623 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
I've tried to answer you above.

Once you are in Terri Schiavo's state, most Americans are happy to see you die-no-they are anxious for you to die.

It's a long story as to how we've arrived at this pass in history, and this isn't the time to discuss it.

My opinion is that the old way was better, but the old way is dead and buried.

1,629 posted on 03/22/2005 5:06:34 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1628 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson