My entire point is that is WAS NOT overridden, and many here were claiming that is was is some way. Weather or not it should be in beside the point. It wasn't.
So stop repeating over and over that he is her husband.
I'm only repeating it because people keep bringing it up. I'd love to quit repeating it! If others would drop it, I will.
Greer has unlawfully refused to allow a motionship for guardianhip, filed in 2002, to be brought forward. It is logically impossible to rule on the merits of such a motion without at minimum hearing a deposition by the current guardian. Unfortunately, Greer has protected Michael Schiavo from ever being subjected to examination by someone who wants to fight Terri's execution. Greer's conduct cannot be rationally explained as anything other than prejudiced at best, if not overtly corrupt.
Forget all the suspicious circumstances around her getting unconscioous.Simply on his standing to gain financially in the event of her death, he could not remain as guardian and petition for her death. You could not get away with it on the board of your local soccer club. If you were to gain financially from a contract with the club,lets say supplying uniforms, you would not be able to vote on the awarding this contract.
Do you understand that concept, is it too complicated?
The fact that Sadist Greer did not disqualify him on that basis, does not change the nature of the conflict.
It means that the judge ERRED, just like the judge ERRED when he ordered that she was to be denied having her teeth brushed for years.
Or do you think the judge was right in doing so?(IF so please state your source for such inhumane treatment)
Maybe you are just one of those who believes that if a judge says something, it is always true?